// FOR SECURITY & GRC
Security & GRC
Security & GRC leaders
e.g. “Investment trade-off — SIEM upgrade vs MDR”
// FOR YOUR ROLE
FORTE/CYBERx was built first for CISOs and CIOs — and it now serves engineering, data & AI, cloud & DevOps, and product & design. Pick your role to see how the 7-advisor council adapts, or start a free mission and let it detect your role from the challenge.
< 60s
From challenge to three defensible options
7
Specialist advisors per mission
2
Free missions — no credit card
100%
Anchored to AU frameworks (CPS 230, ISO 27001, ISO 42001)
// STEP 01
Each role page surfaces the right decision templates, the most relevant advisors, and the regulatory anchors that matter. The product is the same — the language is yours.
// FOR SECURITY & GRC
Security & GRC leaders
e.g. “Investment trade-off — SIEM upgrade vs MDR”
// FOR IT LEADERSHIP
IT executives
e.g. “Vendor consolidation — rationalise 6 SaaS to 3”
// FOR ENGINEERING
Engineering leaders
e.g. “Build vs buy — internal platform vs SaaS”
// FOR DATA & AI
Data & AI leaders
e.g. “GenAI rollout — pilot vs broad enablement”
// FOR CLOUD & DEVOPS
Cloud, DevOps & SRE leaders
e.g. “Multi-cloud vs single-cloud strategy”
// FOR PRODUCT & DESIGN
Product & UX leaders
e.g. “Roadmap trade-off — feature A vs feature B”
// FOR CIOs
Chief Information Officers
e.g. “Where to put next year’s IT budget”
// FOR CTOs
Chief Technology Officers
e.g. “Build vs buy for a core capability”
// FOR CISOs & vCISOs
Chief Information Security Officers
e.g. “Which Essential Eight controls to lift next”
// FOR IT MANAGERS & HEADS OF IT
IT Managers and Heads of IT
e.g. “Switching MSP or bringing IT in-house”
// FOR CEOs & BOARDS
CEOs and company directors
e.g. “Is our cyber spend enough?”
// DECISION TEMPLATES
Pre-built decision templates by role. Click one to start a mission scoped to that exact trade-off.
Investment trade-off — SIEM upgrade vs MDR
Compare cost, coverage and detection latency with FAIR-anchored ranges.
Run this missionBoard paper — quarterly cyber risk update
Get a 5-line BLUF + 3 strategic options the board can approve.
Run this missionRansomware response readiness
Stress-test your playbook against the 72-hour reporting clock.
Run this missionVendor consolidation — rationalise 6 SaaS to 3
Build the CFO-ready savings, risk and switching-cost case.
Run this missionCloud migration sequencing (lift-and-shift vs refactor)
Three options scored by velocity, cost and risk.
Run this missionIT operating-model transformation (centralise vs federate)
Trade off agility, control and cost.
Run this missionBuild vs buy — internal platform vs SaaS
Total-cost, control and velocity trade-off, three options.
Run this missionMonolith → microservices (or not)
Strangler vs rewrite vs stay; risk-adjusted recommendation.
Run this missionPlatform team formation business case
Sequence the team, scope, charter and first 3 wins.
Run this missionGenAI rollout — pilot vs broad enablement
Sequence the rollout with guardrails, training and audit trail.
Run this missionModel deployment governance baseline
Define release gates, drift monitoring and rollback under ISO 42001.
Run this missionAI ethics review — high-risk use case go/no-go
Stress-test against NIST AI RMF and the Privacy Act.
Run this missionMulti-cloud vs single-cloud strategy
Resilience, cost and skills trade-off, three options.
Run this missionFinOps — the next 90 days of savings
Rank levers by $-saved per engineering hour.
Run this missionSRE adoption — error budgets and SLO sequencing
Where to start, what to instrument first.
Run this missionRoadmap trade-off — feature A vs feature B
Three options with revenue, risk and execution scoring.
Run this missionAI-feature go/no-go (with governance)
Stress-test value, risk and rollout under ISO 42001 / Privacy Act.
Run this missionDesign system investment business case
CFO-ready argument for the platform team.
Run this missionWhere to put next year’s IT budget
Rank run, grow and transform spend by risk reduction and business value.
Run this missionEnterprise AI adoption — pilot, platform or pause
Weigh productivity upside against ISO 42001 and Privacy Act exposure.
Run this missionExit or renegotiate a strategic vendor
Model switching cost, lock-in risk and negotiating leverage.
Run this missionBuild vs buy for a core capability
Compare total cost, time to market and lock-in over three years.
Run this missionRewrite, refactor or leave the monolith
Sequence modernisation without stalling the roadmap.
Run this missionShipping AI features safely
Balance speed against data leakage, model risk and ISO 42001.
Run this missionWhich Essential Eight controls to lift next
Sequence ML1 to ML2 by risk reduction per dollar.
Run this missionMDR, SOC or in-house detection
Compare coverage, cost and response time.
Run this missionQuarterly cyber update for directors
Turn technical posture into decisions a board can make.
Run this missionSwitching MSP or bringing IT in-house
Compare cost, service levels and risk of the transition.
Run this missionMicrosoft 365 security settings that matter
Prioritise MFA, backups and admin controls by impact.
Run this missionGetting to Essential Eight Maturity Level 1
A realistic sequence for a small team and budget.
Run this missionIs our cyber spend enough?
Compare your posture and budget with what your obligations require.
Run this missionQuestions to ask after a breach in the news
Turn headlines into checks on your own business.
Run this missionApproving a major technology investment
Test the business case before the board signs off.
Run this mission// HOW IT WORKS
01
Type the trade-off in plain English. The council detects your role from how you frame it.
02
Risk, threat, compliance, finance, technology, business and people perspectives — synthesised by The Architect.
03
Each option is scored on cost, risk and execution feasibility, with a tactical execution plan ready to share.
// WHY THIS, NOT GENERIC AI
Seven specialist advisors deliberate every challenge — risk, threat, compliance, finance, technology, business and people. The Architect synthesises three options.
Every recommendation cites APRA CPS 230, the Cyber Security Act 2024, Privacy Act reform, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 42001:2023 and the AICD Cyber Governance Principles.
From typed challenge to three scored options with a tactical execution plan you can share with the board, the CFO or the engineering team.
// QUESTIONS WE GET
Yes. FORTE/CYBERx was built first for CISOs and CIOs and now serves the entire technology profession. The council adapts its language to your role, whether you are a CTO weighing build-vs-buy, an SRE setting SLOs, a Head of Data shipping a GenAI rollout, or a PM defending an AI feature.
No. The council infers role from how you describe the challenge. Picking a role here just gets you to the most relevant decision examples and FAQ faster.
Yes — two full missions, no credit card. Each free mission gives you the same three options, advisor breakdown and tactical execution plan as a paid mission.
FORTE/CYBERx is an opinionated 7-advisor council, not a single chat. Every option is benchmarked against Australian regulation (APRA CPS 230, the Cyber Security Act 2024, Privacy Act reform, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 42001:2023) and synthesised into a board-ready, defensible recommendation.
// START FREE
The council detects your role from how you describe the challenge. Two free missions, no credit card, full tactical execution plan included.