Part of the compliance capability inside our Fractional CIO practice. We design and stand up an AI Management System (AIMS) that satisfies ISO 42001, maps to Privacy Act obligations and the Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard, and reflects how you actually adopt AI.
Sydney operating base · On-site across NSW · Remote across Australia
A two-day executive workshop to define your AI ambition, principles, risk appetite and the shape of your AIMS.
AI acceptable use, AI risk management, model lifecycle, data & training, human oversight — the full policy set aligned to ISO 42001 controls.
Every applicable obligation in one place — ISO 42001, ISO 27001, the Privacy Act, sector regulation, contractual clauses and customer security schedules — with an owner against each.
A working AI risk register categorised across security, privacy, IP, bias, robustness, transparency, human oversight and third-party risk.
A structured AIIA methodology so every new AI use case is assessed before it goes to production — with an owner and a sign-off.
Policies, approval records, testing evidence and monitoring outputs assembled the way certification auditors read them, plus a quarterly one-page compliance view for the board.
A combined programme that shares evidence, controls and audit cycles across both standards, cutting total effort by roughly a third.

Not another consulting firm. Former enterprise CIOs bringing operator-grade cyber and AI leadership to Australian SMEs.
Cyber strategy, compliance and AI sit with one operator who has led technology inside banking, healthcare, higher education and government.
ISO 42001 practitioners. We secure the enterprise for AI before spinning up flashy tools. Frameworks first, tooling second.
Cybersecurity strategy, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 compliance, and AI consulting delivered as one plan with shared evidence and a single audit cycle.
Sydney-based, delivering across NSW. On-site when it matters, remote-first when it does not.
Every engagement includes FORTE/CYBERx platform access. Our consultants use it live in your board meetings — you keep using it after we leave.
Share the decision or constraint. A senior operator replies within one business day — no sales pod, no scripted discovery.
Run two full decision analyses free, compare practical paths and create a Decision Record and Tactical Plan.
Define AIMS boundaries, interested parties, the AI policy and executive accountability.
Read the guideRun clause 6 risk assessment alongside an ISO 42005 AI system impact assessment.
Read the guideWork through the Annex A control set and justify every inclusion and exclusion.
Read the guideRequirements, design records, verification, deployment gates, monitoring and retirement.
Read the guideProvenance, quality and preparation records reconciled with Privacy Act obligations.
Read the guideClause 9 and 10 audit and review, nonconformities, and Stage 1 / Stage 2 preparation.
Read the guideThere is no single AI act in force. Obligations arrive through the Privacy Act, sector regulation, directors’ duties, contracts and customer assurance requirements, with the Voluntary AI Safety Standard setting the expected guardrails. Most organisations are already in scope through one of these paths.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the first international standard for AI Management Systems, published in December 2023. It sets out how an organisation should govern its use and development of AI — through policy, risk management, impact assessment, human oversight and continual improvement.
For most SMEs, adopting the framework gives you 80 percent of the value. Formal certification matters if you’re in a regulated sector, sell into large enterprises, or want the third-party assurance signal.
ISO 42001 is a governance framework that helps you satisfy either. The EU AI Act is prescriptive law targeted at specific AI systems. Australia’s voluntary AI Safety Standard (2024) aligns closely with ISO 42001 principles. Building against 42001 sets you up for both.
Usually a small AI governance committee — the CIO/CISO or fractional equivalent, the head of data, a legal or risk representative, and an executive sponsor. We help you stand it up and coach the members through the first review cycles.
Yes — this is our recommended path. Overlap in leadership, risk, awareness, supplier and audit clauses means a joint programme cuts your total effort by 25–40 percent compared to sequential.
You don’t need dedicated AI governance tooling to get started. A well-designed GRC surface (or the FORTE/CYBERx platform) covers the artefacts and cadence you need through certification.
Tell us the decision, constraint or opportunity. A senior operator responds within one business day.